Your search found 70 occurrences

Click here for a KWIC Report

Occurrences 7-19:

and diplomat, friend and pen friend of Erasmus, member of the circle of László Szalkai who would become Archbishop of Esztergom. One of the tutors of the child King Louis from 1516, Royal Secretary from 1520. We have no other data about a permanent contact with Brodarics, who was roughly of the same age, but perhaps it is not just by accident that he wrote the letter on the coat of arms, which praises literature and science, in such elegant Latin. 1  Fraknói refers to this letter when he states that one of Brodarics’ tasks was to persuade the Pope to intervene so that Pál Tomori

budge, a one-year-long diplomatic struggle began. Brodarics played an important part of its settlement. More on this: Kasza Péter, Egy magyar diplomata lengyel szolgálatban. Újabb források Brodarics István rmai követi működéséhez., Irodalomtörténeti Közlemények, 2009, 593–605. The same in English: A Hungarian diplomat in Polish service New sources for the functioning of István Brodarics as ambassador in Rome, Camoenae Hungaricae, 2010, 61–73. manuscript: BK 223 fol. 83–84. No doubt, it is the letter by Sigismund in October 1522. 3  Sigismund greeted Hadrian

faciam, ut certe nihil libentius, scio me eodem tempore, quo Maiestati Vestrae servio, servire etiam gratiosissimo et serenissimo principi meo. Quod si non esset, singularis tamen Vestrae Maiestatis virtus, magnanimitas, prudentia et generosi 4  He wrote another letter the same day, in which he asks for confirmation of the kermess that Leo X permitted. The permission became invalid as Leo died. He also asks the after the death of Bishop of Płock Ciołek, who was charged with collecting Peter’s pence, the commission be transferred to Bishop of Poznań Piotr

against the Turks. Venerabilis Fidelis nobis Dilecte. 1 Apud hunc versum eadem manu in marg. add. Copia litterarum regis Hungariae ad oratorem suum Romae. Datum Budae prima Iunii 1523. 2  Another reason to date the letter for May is that the same arguments appear in a letter to Cardinal Bernardo Carvajal sent on 15 May 1523. (Compare: AT VI. 275.) 3 Sigismund sent Hieronym Łaski to Rome to protest raising Marquis of Brandenburg Johann Albrecht Bishop of Płock. (Compare: AT VI. 214–216.) 1  The same manuscript can be found in

the letter for May is that the same arguments appear in a letter to Cardinal Bernardo Carvajal sent on 15 May 1523. (Compare: AT VI. 275.) 3 Sigismund sent Hieronym Łaski to Rome to protest raising Marquis of Brandenburg Johann Albrecht Bishop of Płock. (Compare: AT VI. 214–216.) 1  The same manuscript can be found in the HHStA in Vienna (HHStA, Ung. Akt. Fasc. 1. Konv. D, fol. 96–97.) 2  Only the first third of the letter (Redditum nobis... societatem allicere.) is included in Veress’ documentary compilation. [1.] Redditum nobis paulo

apud pontificem, ut Emericus de Kalna, 3 bonus servitor unacum fratribus Vestrae Dominationis Reverendissimae 1  Ferenc Várdai (around 1460–1524), Bishop of Transylvania. His acquaintance with Brodarics undoubtedly began in Padua where they studied at the same time enjoying the benefices of prebend. Vladis laus II ordered in 1500 (see MOL DL 82165, 82166, 82167, 82200) that Vitus Roznár, as a foreigner, be deprived of his benefices as Custos of Gyulafehérvár, and those were given to Várday. (Compare: Hermann Zsuzsanna, Egy humanista karrierje

Augustin, Vetera monumenta Slavorum meridionalium historiam illustrantia, Romae, 1863, 601–602. 5 Vincenzo Baldi de Pistoria. Arrived in Hungary as a member of the retinue of papal legate Cardinal Pietro Isvalies. He soon became Canon of Veszprém, altar director of the St. John altar, at the same time Vicar of Isvalies who became Bishop of Veszprém in 1508. Compare: Lakatos Bálint, Kálnai Imre királyi titkári és főesperesi kinevezése (1523–1525). Adalékok a pápaság magyar személyi politikájához Mohács előtt, Századok, 2010, 423. 1  The text of the letter is on the

quam etiam ad magnificum dominum oratorem suum et 5 reverendissimum dominum 9  in marg. alia manu fiat, ut petitur. Scibatur viendum [?] ei 1  The letter, apart from some minor changes, is identical to the one sent to Polish King Sigismund the same day (except that the letter to Ferdinand does not have a postscript.) Not only the texts are identical but the ductus as well, so Brodarics’ scriptor wrote the same letter twice and sent both, one to Vienna, the other to Cracow. The only change he made is in the salutation: to the letters in

ei 1  The letter, apart from some minor changes, is identical to the one sent to Polish King Sigismund the same day (except that the letter to Ferdinand does not have a postscript.) Not only the texts are identical but the ductus as well, so Brodarics’ scriptor wrote the same letter twice and sent both, one to Vienna, the other to Cracow. The only change he made is in the salutation: to the letters in Cracow it is Maiestas, since Sigismund was a King, while in the Vienna version it is Serenitas, because Ferdinand was only an Archduke in 1524. 2  Archbishop of

doctor secretarius manu Broderici 10 Concessit... Brodericus secretarius manu Broderici 1  There is no date on the document, and we only know from a remark of the relator Brodarics that King Louis sanctioned the request on 21 February 1525. 2  Both reference the same manuscript. 3  István Szenterzsébeti Terjék, nobleman from Zala county. His sister Orsolya is the mother of Tamás Nádasdy, so he is the uncle of the future Palatine. Student at the Vienna university in 1494. Tenant of the Zalavár abbey with his father from 1518. Compare: Füssy Tamás,

alludes to peace to be signed with the Turks: the idea to bring the official state of war with the Turks, that began in 1521, to an end by peace agreement or armistice was considered several times in the Hungarian court but was rejected every time – partly under pressure from the Pope. The same considerations were spelled out in a letter to Sigismund on 10 June 1523, which shows that Brodarics had seen the situation clearly already then, and, as this letter demonstrates, it did not change much in 2 years. Brodarics’ warnings were heard in the Polish court at least. Sigismund,

of Christianity for years by themselves, but it is the fault of other rulers who were impossible to persuade about the necessity of peace among them. – 4. The Pope’s position on the Knighthood has not changed and whatever he may write after the College of Cardinals, his intention is the same. Brodarics wishes King Louis followed Sigismund’s example in the matter of armistice with the Turks because if he does not do this in the hope of some support, the country’s fall is to be feared. – 5. He has no news on King Francis being taken to Spain. Hope for peace has not evaporated

includendus videtur ipse quoque et regna illius in hanc pacem. It is not placed with the text of the letter but in a separate volume (BN. T. 28. fol. 164r). We do not have the slip of paper with the cipher, only the deciphered text can be read. At the same time, the legate mentioned is definitely Brodarics, since the reference is to the younger cousin of Sigismund, Louis II, and his envoy was Brodarics. The fact that this slip of paper belongs to this particular letter follows from subsequent manuscripts (BK 213 fol. 539; BJ 6549 fol. 572).

Bibliographia locorum inventorum

Click here for a KWIC Report