Your search found 16 occurrences

Click here for a KWIC Report

Occurrences 1-4:

Brodarics István tanulmányainak és családi viszo nyainak történetéhez, Századok, 2008, 1193.) Szatmári, on the other hand, undoubtedly supported the publication of Janus’ works, as shown by the offering to the Bishop of Pécs in the Guarino-panegyricus of Sebestyén Magyi published in 1513. (Compare: Klaniczay Tibor (ed.), Janus Pannonius – Magyarországi humanisták. Budapest, 1982, 662–664. In Latin: Hegedüs István, Analecta nova, Budapest, 1903, 214.) On Brodarics’ connections to Sebestyén Magyi and the Bologna circle see: Révész Mária, Néhány adat Philippus

ob suspicionem Siciliae ad defectionem sollicitatae et rerum novarum motus in custodiam atque adeo in arcem Sancti Angeli coniectum puto Maiestatem Vestram iam pridem intellexisse. De eo adhuc nihil est aliud decretum. 1 Lorenzo Pucci (1458–1531), Bishop of Melf, Cardinal from 1513. Offspring of an influential prelatic family, protonotary apostolic. 2  John Clerk (?–1541), Bishop of Bath. Carried out diplomatic missions in the service of Cardinal Wolsey several times. Cardinales tres, quibus cognitio huius causae demandata fuerat,

1523, what’s more, he was allowed to participate in the conclave. More on his life: K. J. P. Lowe, Church and Politics in Renaissance Italy. The Life and Career of Cardinal Francesco Sodarini (1453–1524), Cambridge, 1993. (Cambridge Studies in Italian History and Culture) 4  Pope Leo X (1513–1521) 5  glorians maria montisque polliceri coepit: Sallustius: Cat. 23, 3 , 4 . Only Sallustius uses this combination of words in classical literature. 6  Francesco Marsupino, one-time Secretary of Archbishop Bakócz, stayed in Rome from 1518 as a permanent Hungarian

quid aliud respondeam, nisi me esse et fore perpetuo, dum vivam, addictissimum 4  Philippus de Senis (Philip of Siena), a cleric in the papal chamber, Canon of Esztergom. Pope Leo X made Philippus de Senis director of chapel consecrated to the Virgin Mary Taken to the Sky in 1513. The chapel belonged to the Esztergom chapter and de Senis entered a long legal battle against the chapter. Compare: Solymosi László (ed.), Az esztergomi székeskáptalan jegyzőkönyve (1500–1502, 1507–1527), Budapest, 2002., 22. Regarding the trial, see the following documents: ASV,

Bibliographia locorum inventorum

Click here for a KWIC Report